People talk of me as being the inventor of the legal thriller.

I hope gay marriage will be legal in every state.

Companies shouldn't use the law to prevent consumers from doing something legal.

I object to a legal approach when settling questions of science or scientific behavior.

I'm not a lawyer, and maybe I should have used more specific legal language.

I have a book coming out in September, for example, where the plot concerns counterfeiting, and I had to do a lot of research on that. Or on any legal matters, for example, I have to do a lot of research online.

For centuries we have been living in the society where not laws but people ruled, where there was no legal state.

There are obviously legal restrictions on what you can do on TV in the States, as there are everywhere.

While there continues to be differences, the important point is that all citizens and elected officials use democratic and legal avenues for solving those differences.

It is curious that, with my somewhat antinomian tendencies, I should have gone to Trinity Hall - which was, and is, before all a Law College - and should thus have been thrown into close touch with the legal element in life.